ABSTRACT
Background: Uveal melanoma is a rare cancer. Up to 50% of patients (pts) develop metastasis, mainly hepatic. Overall survival in metastatic pts is 12 months (mo), contrasting with a good overall condition until death. To evaluate the impact of integrating early palliative care on patient needs and self-efficacy, we designed a comparative randomized trial in MUM pts. Methods: 162 pts will be randomized (1:2) between the control and the experimental groups in two French centres (Institut Curie-Paris and Centre Antoine Lacassagne-Nice). In the control group, palliative care is introduced according to international guidelines. In the experimental group, it is added earlier, concomitant to the announcement of metastases by the medical oncologist. The main objective is to assess if early supportive care impacts on patient psychological needs at 6 mo, versus standard of care, based on the SCNS-SF34 questionnaire. Secondary objectives include patient's other needs at 6 and 12 mo, quality of life (QLQC30), progression-free and overall survival, and partners' needs (SCNS-P&C). MUM pts, suitable for a treatment with no curative intent, ECOG PS 0-1, with no physical or biological sign of disease, and capable of filling questionnaires are eligible. Questionnaires are completed by all pts at each oncological visit (baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 mo). Supportive care visits take place every 6 weeks if needed and address patient's information needs, disease and treatment understanding, social and psychological status, symptoms, and partners' involvement. Prognostic uncertainty and disease seriousness in the absence of symptom is addressed depending on pts' expressed needs. Medical oncologists and supportive care physicians from both centres attend communication skill training provided by an expert during the study. Analyses: SCNS-SF34 psychological needs scale scores at 6-mo will be compared with a Student's t-test, in an ITT analysis. For 10 points mean score difference expected between groups (within standard deviation of 20 points) and a two-sided type 1 error of 5%, inclusion of 54 pts (control group) and 108 pts (experimental group) provides the study 85% of power. The planned inclusion period is 3 years, pts will be followed for one year, for a total study duration of 4 years. From July 2020 to January 2022, 63 pts have been enrolled in the trial;2 pts declined. Five pts were removed early from the study: one for consent retrieval, 4 for early death due to metastasis. COVID-19 delayed enrollment for 5 months. We plan to complete the study Q4 2023 and to analyze the data Q4 2024.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In managing patients with cancer in the COVID-19 era, clinical oncologists and palliative care practitioners had to face new, disrupting and complex medical situations, challenging the quality of the shared decision-making process. During the first lockdown in France, we developed an onco-palliative ethics meeting to enhance the quality of the decision-making process for patients with advanced cancer treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A least one of the institutional ethics committee members was present along with oncologists, palliative care teams, psycho-oncologists, radiologists and intensive care specialists. Specific medical parameters were systematically collected to form a standardised framework for the discussions. RESULTS: The main raised issues were the definition of new criteria for the implementation of invasive resuscitation techniques, optimal ways to adapt or delay anticancer treatment and best procedures to address terminal respiratory failure and end-of-life care. The main clinical and ethical guidelines that emerged during these debates are presented. The palliative care team played a major role in assessing and reporting patients' awareness of cancer-related prognosis and their wishes concerning invasive therapies or transfer to intensive care units, enabling an individualised benefit-risk balance assessment. The ethics committee members ensured continuous monitoring during the discussions. Their function was to recall the main ethical principles including dignity, which is conferred on people when there are treated as having equal status. CONCLUSIONS: The onco-palliative ethics meeting provided a powerful avenue for improvement of collegiality and reinforcement of teamwork, which could be a major protection against burnout for healthcare professionals facing an epidemic onslaught.